\n
![\"\"](\"\/product\/EMSolution\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/nodalforce_problem01.png\")
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.1 TEAM Workshop Problem23<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The obtained electromagnetic forces are shown in Fig. 2. Two results are shown, one with a mesh that is vertically symmetric at the center of the magnet (Fig. 3) and the other with an asymmetric mesh (Fig. 4). The asymmetric mesh produces a non-zero total force even when the coil current is zero, as can be seen by comparing Fig.3 and Fig.4, which are almost similar. <\/p>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.2 Electromagnetic force in z direction acting on the magnet<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.3 Symmetric mesh
(top and bottom)<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.4 Asymmetric mesh<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 show the magnetic flux density distribution in both meshes. Almost no difference is observed. Fig.7 and Fig.8 show the nodal force distribution. In this case, too, the difference is small. However, as for the total force, the asymmetric mesh with current 0 in Fig.2 shows a non-zero electromagnetic force as an error. Fig.7 shows a symmetrical mesh for a coil current of $0.1A \\times 280T$. The change in the nodal force distribution is slight. This indicates that each nodal force is large compared to the total force. Thus, if the magnetic field produced by the coil is smaller than that produced by the magnet itself, even a small asymmetry in the mesh will result in a large error. <\/p>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.5 Symmetric mesh when Magnetic flux density distribution<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.6 Asymmetric mesh with Magnetic flux density distribution<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.7 Symmetric mesh Nodal force distribution<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.8 Asymmetric mesh Nodal force distribution<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n<\/p>\n
Fig.9 Coil current at 0.1A $\\times$ 280T
Nodal force distribution
(symmetric mesh)<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
If the total force is the only issue, the surface magnetization or surface current method can be used to determine the magnetization or current in the magnet, and then the electromagnetic force due to the external magnetic field can be determined. In this case, the self-force of the magnet itself does not appear, so there is no cancellation error and the result may be obtained with high accuracy. EMSolution does not currently employ this method. The following are possible countermeasures. <\/p>\n
- \n
- The mesh should be as fine as possible. <\/li>\n
- If symmetry is present, the mesh should also be as symmetrical as possible. In particular, if there is a state in which electromagnetic forces do not act, analyze that state and make the mesh as small as possible so that the total force is as small as possible. <\/li>\n
- As can be seen in Fig. 2, the error due to mesh distortion does not seem to depend much on the externally applied magnetic field. For this reason, it is possible to subtract from the calculation results the error in the state where the total force should be zero. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
To improve the problem of electromagnetic force analysis, a method to calculate electromagnetic forces including nodal forces in the air region is shown in "Improvement of Electromagnetic Force Analysis"<\/font><\/a>. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Download<\/h3>\n